Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 00:00

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Thank you.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
SpaceX knocks out another national security launch while ULA faces scrutiny - Yahoo
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
When did women stop wearing bonnets in North America?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Why didn't people like the Game of Thrones ending?
What’s next?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Jessie J breast cancer: singer undergoes surgery after diagnosis - BBC
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
What is your best and worst childhood memory? What was your biggest fear as a child?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.